Criteria

In the evaluation and ranking of submitted projects the jury will award high marks according to the following criteria:

1. Innovation in Project Idea - Novelty

  • Does the project embody a new social approach or offer new solutions?
  • Is the project about new ways of looking at a social problem?
  • Does the project address target groups that have previously received little attention?

2. Innovation in Accessing Target Groups - Involvement

  • What is the concrete and enduring use of the project for the target group?
  • Does the project further the potential of the target group?
  • Does the project contribute to society’s esteem for the target group?

3. Innovation in the Realisation of the Project - Effectiveness

  • Does project realisation happen in an inventive, resourceful, creative and courageous way?
  • What effects – and on who – of this social innovation can be observed?
  • Does the project change with changing needs? For example as to the target group, the way of approaching the issue, or a changing project environment?
  • Is there cooperation between different disciplines / competencies / professional groups?

4. Innovation in Public Perception – Serving as an Example

  • How is the project integrated into local and regional environments?
  • Does the project foster dialogue / cooperation with other institutions / organisations?
  • Have other organisations, media, sponsors, politicians been made curious?
  • Have new paths been taken in dealing with the “Outside world”?


The criteria 1 (Project Idea), 2 (Accessing the Target Group) and 3 (Realisation) will have twice the weight of criterion 4 (Innovation in Public Perception) in the jury’s decisions.